IPSO’s sham arbitration system

28 Nov
IPSO’s sham arbitration system

IPSO has announced what it falsely claims to be a new “Leveson-style” arbitration scheme in its latest attempt to mislead the public into believing that it is implementing the recommendations of the Leveson Report and providing access to justice to members of the public.  Its original “pilot” scheme had no takers and was flawed in

Shares 0

15 Nov
The government’s consultation on the press: Amber Rudd and Karen Bradley are trying to deceive the public

Home Secretary Amber Rudd and Culture Secretary Karen Bradley have launched a public consultation on the press, but in flagrant breach of the spirit of honest consultation they are twisting the truth and loading the odds. The full online document runs to 35 deeply flawed pages, but this article analyses only the short introduction written

Shares 0

12 Oct
The Pilling Review of IPSO: An exercise in futility

By Martin Moore If the Pilling Review [pdf] was the industry’s attempt to give IPSO some legitimacy then it has backfired. The review was set up by IPSO, paid for by IPSO, and had terms of reference agreed with IPSO, in order to assess the independence and effectiveness of IPSO. In that sense its purpose

Shares 0

25 Feb
An ‘external reviewer’ for IPSO? We’ve heard that one before

By Brian Cathcart The more that IPSO struggles to appear different from the discredited Press Complaints Commission (PCC) it is supposed to replace, the more it reveals itself to be just the same. In its latest spasm of activity it has appointed an External Reviewer in the person of Sir Joseph Pilling, a former Permanent

Shares 0

24 Feb
IPSO’s sham audit will never have any legitimacy

Commenting on the news that IPSO have appointed Sir Joseph Pilling to audit themselves, Dr Evan Harris, Joint Executive Director of Hacked Off, said: “This external audit of IPSO is not independent and nor is it directed to the criteria needed for a regulator to be deemed as independent or effective. Those criteria were set

Shares 0

24 Feb
IPSO fails the test

By Brian Cathcart How do we know when press regulation is good enough? The question is topical because IPSO, the self-regulator established by the big corporate newspapers, has been trying lately to persuade us it can be trusted to do its job. IPSO has revealed changes to its rules which it says give it increased

Shares 0

24 Dec
#1in5Muslims: how even Twitter does a better job than IPSO

November press monitoring blog by Georgia Tomlinson In November, the Sun published a front-page story entitled ‘1 in 5 Brit Muslims’ sympathy for jihadis’ based on a survey commissioned by the Sun from the polling company Survation. It also published an opinion piece by Kelvin McKenzie headlined ‘This shocking poll means we must shut door

Shares 0